« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 151

Author Topic: Image Thread  (Read 1689926 times)

Seejo Crux

  • I am worth 100 points in GURPS...ladies
  • ***
  • Posts: 114
  • High INT, Low CHA. Tend to be social misfits.
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #780 on: October 31, 2010, 03:40:22 PM »
« Last Edit: October 31, 2010, 03:43:15 PM by Seejo Crux »
Logged

clockworkjoe

  • BUY MY BOOK
  • Administrator
  • Extreme XP CEO
  • *****
  • Posts: 6517
    • View Profile
    • BUY MY BOOK
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #781 on: November 01, 2010, 10:39:06 PM »
Logged

FuzzyDan

  • I am worth 100 points in GURPS...ladies
  • ***
  • Posts: 193
  • Official Keeper of The Line.
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #782 on: November 02, 2010, 12:39:33 AM »
Quote from: Order66 on November 02, 2010, 12:33:27 AM


More like Maximum damage, plus any bonus dice for high-crit, massive critical, or enhancement bonus.
Logged
- Dan, Adding one to his Darkspiral Aura.

Salkovich

  • I walk between the rain drops, tommy gun and katana in hand
  • *****
  • Posts: 805
  • Concupiscent Piranha of the Apocalypse
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #783 on: November 02, 2010, 12:40:10 AM »
Quote from: FuzzyDan on November 02, 2010, 12:39:33 AM
Quote from: Order66 on November 02, 2010, 12:33:27 AM


More like Maximum damage, plus any bonus dice for high-crit, massive critical, or enhancement bonus.


CRITICAL BURN
Logged
"It's heresy. Burn the heretics." - Ross Payton NEVAR FORGET
"If you are asked, 'Would you like Abraham Lincoln', your answer is always YES."

Setherick

  • Administrator
  • Cosmic Horror: 1d10/1d100 SAN loss
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Economies of Scale
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #784 on: November 02, 2010, 09:02:02 AM »
Quote from: FuzzyDan on November 02, 2010, 12:39:33 AM

More like Maximum damage, plus any bonus dice for high-crit, massive critical, or enhancement bonus.

It's been a long time since I played 2nd Ed, but I'm pretty sure I remember a Nat 20 meant double damage.
Logged
"Something smart so that I can impress people I don't know." - Some Author I've Not Read

Zeriken

  • Zombie Apocalypse Survivor
  • **
  • Posts: 90
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #785 on: November 02, 2010, 09:28:35 AM »
2nd Ed? I'll just be leaving this here....



Logged
Magadheera - Must find sub of this movie.

Flawless P

  • I walk between the rain drops, tommy gun and katana in hand
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #786 on: November 03, 2010, 11:16:00 AM »
Also 3rd ed was x2, x3, or x4

So assuming a natural 20 on an attack roll with the most common weapon in 3rd ed, The greatsword. Your getting x2 damage.
Logged
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
If you can't fix it with duck tape you haven't used enough.
I intend to live forever -- so far, so good.

beowuuf

  • I dream in graph paper lines
  • ****
  • Posts: 355
    • View Profile
    • DM.com - forums dedicated to a 25 year old PC game.
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #787 on: November 03, 2010, 02:53:58 PM »

With 3rd edition you confirmed the crit, and only if you successfully hit again did you get to do x2, x 3 etc damage. Glad to be rid of confirming in favour of max damage.

Logged

Boyos

  • President of the Apparatus of Kwalish fan club
  • *****
  • Posts: 1618
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #788 on: November 04, 2010, 03:36:17 PM »
I think max damage is still better no matter what. caus x2/3/4 on a roll of 1 is still only 2/3/4.
Logged

Flawless P

  • I walk between the rain drops, tommy gun and katana in hand
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #789 on: November 04, 2010, 05:19:51 PM »
Quote from: beowuuf on November 03, 2010, 02:53:58 PM
With 3rd edition you confirmed the crit, and only if you successfully hit again did you get to do x2, x 3 etc damage. Glad to be rid of confirming in favour of max damage.

We never actually confirm our criticals, we just run with it.
Quote from: Boyos
I think max damage is still better no matter what. caus x2/3/4 on a roll of 1 is still only 2/3/4.

The only reason I like the multiplier is that a critical hit can be extremely deadly to you or the enemy, having a critical hit scored is pretty nerve wracking(at least i think so) seeing the damage roll a 1 or 2 is one of the greatest feelings of relief. For instance one of my players was buffed/enlarged last night, and critically hit with his enlarged greatsword for 3d6+9
Minimum damage being 24 is not bad during a non epic combat.

I see your point but I think there are merits to both systems.
« Last Edit: November 04, 2010, 05:41:10 PM by Flawless P »
Logged
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
If you can't fix it with duck tape you haven't used enough.
I intend to live forever -- so far, so good.

Arje

  • Play by Post Dude. Malcontent.
  • Global Moderator
  • Oregon Trail 13 Superstar
  • *****
  • Posts: 516
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #790 on: November 04, 2010, 06:40:52 PM »
Logged
My new goal in life is to play D&D with Judi Dench

Flawless P

  • I walk between the rain drops, tommy gun and katana in hand
  • *****
  • Posts: 1024
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #791 on: November 04, 2010, 06:57:59 PM »
back on topic with some Doctor Who stuff...

[spoiler][/spoiler]


and some DnD stuff
[spoiler][/spoiler]
Logged
42.7% of all statistics are made up on the spot.
If you can't fix it with duck tape you haven't used enough.
I intend to live forever -- so far, so good.

clockworkjoe

  • BUY MY BOOK
  • Administrator
  • Extreme XP CEO
  • *****
  • Posts: 6517
    • View Profile
    • BUY MY BOOK
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #792 on: November 04, 2010, 08:36:09 PM »
Quote from: Order66 on November 04, 2010, 07:47:06 PM
Quote from: Flawless P on November 04, 2010, 05:19:51 PM
Quote from: beowuuf on November 03, 2010, 02:53:58 PM
With 3rd edition you confirmed the crit, and only if you successfully hit again did you get to do x2, x 3 etc damage. Glad to be rid of confirming in favour of max damage.

We never actually confirm our criticals, we just run with it.
Quote from: Boyos
I think max damage is still better no matter what. caus x2/3/4 on a roll of 1 is still only 2/3/4.

The only reason I like the multiplier is that a critical hit can be extremely deadly to you or the enemy, having a critical hit scored is pretty nerve wracking(at least i think so) seeing the damage roll a 1 or 2 is one of the greatest feelings of relief. For instance one of my players was buffed/enlarged last night, and critically hit with his enlarged greatsword for 3d6+9
Minimum damage being 24 is not bad during a non epic combat.

I see your point but I think there are merits to both systems.



Logged

BeyondSandrock

  • I dream in graph paper lines
  • ****
  • Posts: 464
  • Give Life Back to Music
    • View Profile
    • The BrightSide Lair - My Personal Repository for Stuff
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #793 on: November 04, 2010, 09:20:06 PM »
Quote from: Flawless P on November 04, 2010, 06:57:59 PM
back on topic with some Doctor Who stuff...

[spoiler][/spoiler]

Damn you for posting that picture before I could! FINE! I summon Zoidberg to teach you a lesson in..something:

Logged
"All of time and space, everything that ever happened or will happen. Where do you want to begin?"

Setherick

  • Administrator
  • Cosmic Horror: 1d10/1d100 SAN loss
  • *****
  • Posts: 2583
  • Economies of Scale
    • View Profile
Re: Image Thread
« Reply #794 on: November 04, 2010, 10:09:28 PM »
You seriously don't want to play this game with Ross. He's got more years worth of material than you've been alive.
Logged
"Something smart so that I can impress people I don't know." - Some Author I've Not Read
Pages: 1 ... 51 52 [53] 54 55 ... 151
« previous next »