I was initially very confused by this description of Sarkis. Why would a generous, humble, faithful man serve the Crown?
Listening to the new Actual Play, this quickly became clear. Sarkis is not really generous, humble and faithful - he might certainly appear so. But his role in the Revolutionary War is particularly insidious. It is easy to rail against a faceless, distant authority that passes draconian laws and regulations. But when the authority is tied to a particularly close person, especially a charismatic and charitable person, people are much less willing to oppose. Especially when they owe money to the aforementioned person.
Sarkis makes people want to be ruled by the Crown. That's my interpretation, anyways.