Is it weird that the highest ranked podcasts tend towards the least money spent by their listeners per year?
I think the correlation (it isn't perfect but passes the eyeball test) is really on number of podcasts listened to & dollars spent. It makes sense, in a way.
If I'm a casual football fan, I might read ESPN or a handful of sites (the very popular "main stream sites" At the top of the study list). If I am a super football fan, I probably go to a broader set of sites, possibly subscribe to football analytics / statistics sites, etc.
I will consume more data and potentially spend more for it.
I think the main takeaway from this is that someone in the RPPR crew needs to pretend to be a chick. Could we do a poll?